Friday, April 10, 2026

REBUILDING STRENGTH, RESTORING IDENTITY

Why Strength Training Must Stand at the Center of Cancer Recovery

By Dr. Noelle Cutter

 

There is a moment in every athlete’s life when performance defines identity. It is not just about competition or training—it is about who you are when your body is working, responding, improving. Now imagine that identity interrupted. A diagnosis. A treatment plan. A forced pause. For many athletes, especially those facing cancer, this interruption is not just physical—it is deeply psychological.

 

What I have come to understand, both through my work and my lived observations, is that recovery is not simply about survival. It is about restoration. And at the center of that restoration—far more than we currently acknowledge—sits strength training.

 

We often default to endurance-based models when we think about exercise: running, cycling, long-duration cardiovascular work. These are valuable, no question. But when we look more closely at what athletes—and particularly cancer survivors—actually need, a different picture begins to emerge. Strength training is not just a supplement. It is foundational.

 

 

Strength Training vs. Endurance: A Critical Distinction

Endurance exercise has long been associated with the release of endorphins—the so-called “runner’s high.” It is effective, but it is also transient. Anyone who has completed a long-distance run knows that the experience is not uniformly positive. There are peaks and valleys, moments of motivation followed by fatigue, even frustration.

 

Strength training, in contrast, offers a different physiological and psychological profile. The workouts are shorter. More focused. More controlled. And the effects—particularly at the neurochemical level—appear to be more sustained.

 

From what we are beginning to understand, strength training promotes the release of dopamine, serotonin, endorphins, and oxytocin in ways that extend beyond the workout itself. It is not just about how you feel during the session—it is about how you feel hours later, even the next day. That sustained elevation matters. It builds consistency. It builds adherence. And most importantly, it builds confidence.

 

For someone recovering from cancer, this distinction is everything.

 

 

The Power of Frequency and Sustainability

One of the most powerful aspects of strength training is its accessibility. You do not need hours each day. In fact, you do not want them. Two to three sessions per week, done correctly, can produce meaningful changes—not just in muscle, but in mindset.

 

This is particularly important in populations that are rebuilding. After cancer treatment, energy is often limited. Motivation can be fragile. The idea of committing to long, exhaustive workouts can be overwhelming. Strength training removes that barrier.

 

Shorter sessions. Measurable progress. Clear endpoints. These are not small details—they are the difference between participation and avoidance. When someone can complete a session, feel stronger, and carry that feeling forward into the next day, we begin to create momentum. And momentum is what drives recovery.

 

Strength as a Universal Foundation

Regardless of the sport—whether someone is a triathlete, a runner, a cyclist, or simply someone trying to return to daily function—strength training underpins everything. Muscle is not isolated. When we rebuild muscle, we are rebuilding systems. We are supporting cardiovascular health. We are enhancing neurological function. We are improving metabolic efficiency. We are stabilizing joints and preventing injury.

 

In cancer recovery, this becomes even more significant. Treatments often deplete muscle mass. They alter metabolism. They affect coordination and balance. Strength training addresses all of these deficits simultaneously. It is not an add-on. It is the base.

 

 

The Missing Piece: Long-Term Neurochemical Impact

Despite all of this, there remains a gap in our understanding. We know that strength training influences neurotransmitters. We know that it improves mood. But we do not yet fully understand the long-term neurochemical adaptations that occur with consistent resistance training. This is an area that demands further research.

 

If we can quantify how strength training sustains dopamine or serotonin levels over time, we can begin to position it not just as physical rehabilitation, but as a core psychological intervention. We can begin to prescribe it with the same intention that we prescribe medication. And for populations dealing with anxiety, depression, or post-treatment emotional fatigue, that could be transformative.

 

 

Reclaiming the Athlete Identity

For athletes, recovery is not just about regaining physical capacity—it is about reclaiming identity.

When a diagnosis occurs, especially something as disruptive as cancer, the athlete is often stripped of the very behaviors that define them. Training stops. Competition disappears. The body feels unfamiliar, unpredictable.

 

What replaces that identity?

This is where strength training becomes more than exercise. It becomes a bridge. Each session is an opportunity to reconnect with the body. To experience control. To see progress. To feel capable again. These are not abstract benefits—they are deeply psychological anchors. Exercise provides emotional regulation. It restores self-worth. It creates a sense of normalcy in a time that is anything but normal. And perhaps most importantly, it reintroduces the idea that improvement is still possible.

 

Exercise Oncology: A New Frontier

The integration of exercise into cancer care—what we now refer to as exercise oncology—is gaining traction, but we are still at the beginning. What excites me most about this field is its potential to redefine recovery. Not as a passive process, but as an active, participatory one.

 

For young patients, and especially for athletes, the goal cannot simply be remission. It must be restoration. A return to sport. A return to function. A return to self. Strength training plays a central role in this.

It allows us to rebuild systematically. To progress safely. To track improvements. And to do so in a way that supports both physical and emotional resilience. We are not just helping patients survive—we are helping them re-engage with life.

 

Returning Stronger Than Before

There is a narrative that often surrounds cancer recovery: that the goal is to return to baseline. To get back to where you were. I challenge that.

 

What if the goal is not to return—but to rebuild beyond? With the right approach, with structured strength training, with proper nutrition and support, there is an opportunity for patients to come back stronger. More aware of their bodies. More intentional in their training. More resilient in their mindset. This is not unrealistic. It is already happening. But it requires a shift in how we think.

 

We must move away from viewing exercise as optional. As something to be added if time allows. Instead, we need to recognize it as a central component of care.

 

Recovery as Reclamation

At its core, this is about reclamation. Reclaiming strength. Reclaiming identity. Reclaiming control. When I think about the athletes I work with, and the patients navigating recovery, I do not see fragility. I see potential. I see individuals who, with the right tools, can redefine what recovery looks like.

 

Strength training is one of those tools. Perhaps the most powerful one we have yet to fully embrace.

It is time we give it the attention it deserves. Because recovery is not just about surviving what happened. It is about building what comes next.

 


 


ReBuilding to Last: Strength, Longevity, and the Technology That Multiplies Human Potential

An exclusive interivew with ELLEN TYSON

Written by: Lennard M. Goetze, Ed.D


ELLEN TYSON does not frame fitness as vanity. She frames it as survival, agency, and long-term independence. A strength training coach and Visionbody brand evangelist, Tyson speaks with the authority of lived experience: the arc of her life reshaped by movement after decades of chemical depression, and later refined by a clear-eyed understanding of what aging demands of the body. Her message is simple but uncompromising: muscle is the infrastructure of longevity. “Muscle is your biggest organ of longevity,” Tyson says. “Before supplements, before vitamins—build your muscles.” For Ellen, strength training is not a trend. It is preventive medicine. 

 

FROM SURVIVAL TO STRENGTH: A PERSONAL TURNING POINT

Tyson’s path into strength training was not born of aesthetics or athletic ambition. For much of her adult life, she managed recurring chemical depression. In her forties, she discovered that consistent exercise did something medication never fully achieved: it stabilized her mental health. “Since I was 44… I have not had a depressive episode,” she explains. “I’ve been sad, but not the chemical depression that sent me over the edge every couple of years.”

What began as a social activity became a physiological reset. Over time, she recognized a deeper pattern: movement changed not only her mood, but her metabolism, bone density, and resilience. This realization reframed fitness from self-improvement to self-preservation. “Resistance training is preventative medicine,” she says.

As her children grew older, Tyson transitioned into professional training. The work resonated because it mirrored her own transformation. She no longer trained clients for appearance. “I care not what I look like in a bikini… I care about being strong and healthy. The byproduct is the lean body.

The outcome is functional longevity: the ability to walk well, recover faster, and remain metabolically active with age.

SEE COMPLETE STORY


 

Movement as Medicine: My Journey with Exercise Oncology

One of the most important lessons I’ve learned through cancer is that movement matters. I had never even heard the term exercise oncology until recently, but the truth is I’ve been living it for decades. “I have never heard the term exercise oncology,” I’ve said before, “but I’ve been living it for 27 years.”  When I was first diagnosed, all I could think about was getting back to the gym. For me, the gym represented healing. It represented normal life. And as I went through treatment after treatment, that belief stayed with me. If all I could do was walk, then I walked. And I walked a lot.

 

Sometimes that meant a long walk around the neighborhood. Other days it meant just making it to the mailbox. But movement—any movement—meant progress.

 

Chemotherapy and cancer treatment take a serious toll on the body. The drugs attack fast-growing cells, which means they affect far more than the cancer itself. I lost my sense of taste. My digestive system was wrecked. I experienced brain fog—what many patients call “chemo brain.” And the exhaustion is hard to explain to someone who hasn’t lived through it. It’s not just being tired—it’s a deep physical depletion. But I learned something important: even small movement helps the body fight back.

Exercise helps circulation. It helps the body process medications. It helps clear toxins from the system. And maybe most importantly, it gives you back a sense of control. There are many things cancer patients can’t control. We can’t control the cells in our bodies that start behaving badly. But there are things we can control. We can control how we move. We can control how we manage stress. And we can control the food we put into our bodies.

For me, those became the three pillars of survival. Today I still participate in the Livestrong program at the YMCA, working out alongside other cancer survivors in 12-week training groups. I’ve been doing it for more than a decade now. Every time I walk into that room, I’m reminded that movement is one of the most powerful tools we have in the fight against cancer.

SEE COMPLETE STORY



Redefining Cancer Care through Exercise Oncology


In today’s rapidly evolving healthcare landscape, innovation is no longer confined to pharmaceuticals, surgical techniques, or diagnostic breakthroughs. Increasingly, a powerful yet often underutilized tool is gaining recognition within oncology: exercise as medicine. At the forefront of this movement is Christopher Fitzmaurice, MS, CEP, CSCS, CET, a clinical exercise physiologist at the University of Miami Health System whose work is helping reshape how cancer patients and survivors approach recovery, resilience, and long-term health.

With credentials that span clinical exercise physiology, strength and conditioning, and cancer-specific training, Fitzmaurice represents a new generation of healthcare professionals bridging performance science with medical care. As a Certified Cancer Exercise Trainer (CET) and Certified Strength & Conditioning Specialist (CSCS), his expertise lies not only in optimizing physical performance, but in translating that knowledge into meaningful, life-enhancing outcomes for individuals navigating one of the most challenging diagnoses imaginable.

Currently working within the executive health and concierge medicine program at the University of Miami, Fitzmaurice’s journey was shaped by his earlier tenure at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, where he spent several years working directly with cancer patients and survivors. It was here that his professional path evolved into a mission.

“My mission is to make exercise the standard of care—not just for some, but for all, and especially for cancer survivors.”  While many practitioners enter oncology through traditional clinical routes, Fitzmaurice’s perspective was informed by both personal and professional experiences. Having lost family members to cancer, he carried a personal connection to the disease. However, it was his hands-on clinical exposure that crystallized his purpose.

“I’ve always been connected to cancer through family, but I didn’t become truly passionate until I started working directly with patients and saw the need firsthand.”

  



How Movement Strengthens Cognition and Extends Longevity

By: Barbara Bartlik, MD

For decades, exercise has been associated with weight control, cardiovascular fitness, and muscular strength. However, modern neuroscience and longevity research now demonstrate that movement may be one of the most powerful tools available to protect the brain, sharpen cognition, and extend healthy lifespan. Far from being simply a lifestyle choice, regular physical activity is increasingly recognized as a biological intervention capable of reshaping the brain, protecting neurological function, and improving mental resilience.

The Brain Was Built to Move

Human physiology evolved around movement. Walking, lifting, running, and coordinated activity stimulated circulation, oxygen delivery, and neural engagement long before modern sedentary lifestyles emerged. When the body moves, the brain receives a cascade of physiological benefits.

Exercise increases cerebral blood flow, delivering oxygen and glucose to neurons that require constant energy to function. Improved circulation also helps remove metabolic waste products from brain tissue, reducing inflammation and oxidative stress—two major drivers of neurological aging.

Studies using brain imaging technologies consistently show that physically active individuals maintain greater brain volume in regions responsible for memory, learning, and executive function. The hippocampus, a critical structure for memory formation, is particularly sensitive to physical activity and has been shown to enlarge in response to regular aerobic exercise.


SEE COMPLETE STORY


Copyright Notice © 2025 Overture Publications. All rights reserved. This work and all materials contained herein are the intellectual property of Overture Publications under the Institute for Global Health Innovations and its authorized contributors. No part of this manuscript may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without prior written permission from the publisher. All names, images, and materials are protected under applicable copyright and intellectual-property laws in the United States and internationally. Any reference to individuals, institutions, or proprietary entities is for informational purposes only and does not imply endorsement or affiliation unless expressly stated. All trademarks and service marks mentioned are the property of their respective owners.

If our goal is not only to extend life but to improve the quality and strength of that life, then exercise must be recognized as a central pillar in cancer recovery, rehabilitation, and ultimately, longevity.



Friday, March 14, 2025

Partnering with Technology to Shape the Future of Research

 By Dr. Noelle Cutter

The draft paper we initially circulated was more of an overview—a starting point for what we hope to refine into a final publication. We’re incredibly grateful for the opportunity to work with the Terason ultrasound system, and after using it firsthand, we found it to be an extremely effective imaging tool, especially for the specific group of patients we studied.

Our focus was on women with dense breast tissue—primarily athletes under 45, some of whom fell into a higher-risk category. As we know, traditional mammography often struggles to detect abnormalities in dense breast tissue. This made it essential for us to explore the capabilities of the Terason system in providing clearer, more reliable imaging.  We were beyond impressed with its performance. Having access to a portable, high-quality ultrasound device was invaluable. And, of course, Dr. Robert Bard’s expertise in radiological imaging played a crucial role in this project.

Background & Motivation

This study is a passion project for me. As a triathlete and endurance athlete, I’ve noticed within my own community—both as a coach and as a competitor—that many women I train with have been diagnosed with dense breasts, myself included. Several had cancer scares, and one was ultimately diagnosed with breast cancer. These experiences sparked conversations: Why was this happening? Was there something unique about this group of women that made them more susceptible?

We already understand the link between dense breast tissue and increased cancer risk. However, we wanted to examine this relationship specifically in young female athletes—individuals who are typically considered the pinnacle of health. This led to further questions: Could hormonal variations play a role? Does body composition—low body fat, high muscle mass—affect breast tissue density? Would these women benefit from tailored screening approaches beyond standard mammography?

This is where the Terason ultrasound system became instrumental. Its ease of use, real-time imaging capabilities, and portability allowed us to conduct screenings efficiently and conveniently, even in unconventional settings like race events. Athletes were eager to participate, making it possible for us to gather valuable data. Beyond our specific focus group, we recognized the potential for this technology to improve screening accessibility for other communities—particularly those with limited access to routine breast exams.

Study Overview & Findings

For our initial case study, we worked with four women under 45, all endurance athletes with pre-diagnosed dense breasts. One was a breast cancer survivor. Our goals were to evaluate the sensitivity of the Terason device, assess imaging resolution, and determine any unique findings within this population.

Case Summaries:

1.      38-Year-Old Marathon Runner

o    Mammograms had been inconclusive.

o    Ultrasound confirmed the need for continued routine monitoring.

2.      Endurance Cyclist

o    Experienced regular hormonal imbalances.

o    Ultrasound revealed a suspected fibroadenoma, which she was previously unaware of.

3.      Breast Cancer Survivor (Triathlete, Ironman Competitor)

o    The ultrasound effectively distinguished post-treatment changes from previous malignant areas.

o    Provided valuable insights for ongoing monitoring.

The results demonstrated the advantages of Terason’s imaging capabilities—particularly in identifying lesions that mammography might miss. The system’s accessibility, portability, and high-resolution imaging made it an excellent tool for this specialized patient population.

Implications & Future Directions

Beyond the immediate study, the potential applications of this technology are vast. We’ve seen firsthand how the Terason ultrasound can empower women to take charge of their healthcare—whether it’s through better screening, education, or simply knowing their options. This device’s flexibility could extend its benefits to underserved communities where access to breast imaging is limited.

Looking ahead, we hope to expand this research into larger clinical studies, incorporating a broader patient pool. There’s also an opportunity to explore collaborations with other researchers who share similar interests in breast health and innovative imaging solutions. Securing funding will be key to scaling these efforts, and publishing our findings is an essential next step in that process.

Final Thoughts

This project wouldn’t have been possible without the combined support of Terason and Dr. Bard. The integration of cutting-edge imaging technology with expert analysis has allowed us to take significant steps in addressing gaps in breast cancer screening for young, active women.

Ultimately, our goal is to continue advocating for improved screening methods, particularly for populations that may not fit the standard model of breast cancer risk. The more we can learn, share, and innovate, the better we can support women in making informed decisions about their health.

We’re excited to move forward—refining our findings, seeking funding, and expanding our research. The potential here is enormous, and we’re eager to see where it leads next.

 

Wednesday, February 12, 2025

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: CANCER ON LONG ISLAND

8/2024- From London England, Dr. Noelle Cutter sat before the podcast camera, poised to introduce her esteemed colleague telecast from Long Island, NY. "It is my pleasure to welcome Benjamin Honigsfeld to the camera —soon to be Dr. Honigsfeld—who has been both a former student and now a co-researcher alongside me. Together, we have been investigating breast cancer, with a particular focus on its prevalence on Long Island and within the surrounding environment. It is an honor to have him join us today."

PROUD PROFESSOR HOSTS FORMER TOP STUDENT


In recent years, their research has centered on understanding how breast cancer manifests in the Long Island and tri-state area—an issue that has long been a source of concern. The region has shown an unusually high incidence of breast cancer, with an alarming number of younger women receiving diagnoses each year. This pattern has raised critical questions within the scientific community, prompting Dr. Cutter and Benjamin Honigsfeld to explore potential environmental and biological factors at play.

Their collaboration stemmed from a shared curiosity about this unsettling trend. Honigsfeld, once a dedicated research student under Dr. Cutter’s mentorship, had expressed a strong desire to delve deeper into the available data. Both researchers arrived at the same pressing question: Why isn’t there more research on this issue? What crucial information remains undiscovered, and how can they contribute to filling these gaps in knowledge?

Turning to Honigsfeld, Dr. Cutter reflected on his unique perspective, shaped by his background in cancer research and his ongoing journey toward becoming a medical doctor. "Given your experience in both studying cancer and your current medical training, how has this research shaped your understanding of the issue? Where do you see our investigation heading next as we continue to explore this critical topic?"







A TOXICOLOGIST'S GEO OVERVIEW:  Feat. Benjamin Honigsfeld

Between earning a bachelor's degree at Molloy and pursuing a medical degree, Benjamin Honigsfeld had the opportunity to obtain a master's in toxicology. This academic background provided a strong foundation in environmental toxicology, particularly concerning chemical spills and environmental disasters. When discussing the notably high incidence of breast cancer on Long Island, it became clear that such a pattern could not be purely coincidental. This realization led to an in-depth investigation into the unique environmental factors affecting Long Island.

"...When we start talking about the high incidence of breast cancer on Long Island, there's gotta be a reason", states Honigsfeld. "It just can't just be a random event. So I started really looking into what's so unique about this area- like the Hudson Bay area in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. A few things popped out that I included in my report- but the major one that caught my attention was the Grumman oil spills. And there's a plume in Bethpage. So basically during the second World War, the United States government enlisted Grumman and other aspects of the military industrial complex to gear up for combat. 

At the time, the long-term environmental consequences of mass-producing weapons, fuel, and aircraft were not well understood. As a result, substantial environmental damage occurred, including a groundwater contamination plume originating in Bethpage. This contamination introduced volatile organic chemicals into the water supply, including 1,4-dioxane, a suspected carcinogen that has only recently come under scrutiny.

The primary focus of this research has been Long Island, though there is also a smaller contamination plume further east in Suffolk County, near Calverton. One of the most pressing concerns in the scientific community is the presence of 1,4-dioxane in these chemical plumes. A recent study, conducted by an Ivy League institution in May, identified 1,4-dioxane as likely hepatotoxic, with potential links to hepatocellular carcinoma. This compound has been detected in multiple chemical spills, including those in Bethpage and Calverton.

Another significant area of interest in cancer research is immunotherapy, particularly CAR T-cell therapy. This cutting-edge approach involves extracting helper T cells and cytotoxic T cells from a patient, modifying them with recognition proteins and antigens specific to cancer cells, and reintroducing them into the body. This method aims to sensitize the immune system to cancer cells, potentially enhancing the body’s ability to mount an effective immune response. While CAR T-cell therapy holds promise for treating ovarian cancer, its applications extend to many other forms of cancer, and ongoing research continues to explore its potential.

Future research is likely to focus on further investigating the relationship between volatile organic compounds, 1,4-dioxane, and breast cancer. Current findings suggest hepatotoxicity and a potential link to hepatocellular carcinoma, but more extensive studies are needed to determine whether exposure to these chemicals increases the risk of breast cancer and its various subtypes. As research progresses, uncovering the full impact of environmental toxins on cancer incidence remains a critical priority.

REBUILDING STRENGTH, RESTORING IDENTITY

Why Strength Training Must Stand at the Center of Cancer Recovery By Dr. Noelle Cutter   There is a moment in every athlete’s life w...